Prosodic Cues and Answer Type Detection for the Deception Sub-Challenge
نویسندگان
چکیده
Deception is a deliberate act to deceive interlocutor by transmitting a message containing false or misleading information. Detection of deception consists in the search for reliable differences between liars and truth-tellers. In this paper, we used the Deceptive Speech Database (DSD) provided for the Deception sub-challenge. DSD consists of deceptive and non-deceptive answers to a set of unknown questions. We have investigated linguistic cues: prosodic cues (pauses and phone duration, speech segmentation) and answer types (e.g., opinion, self-report, offense denial). These cues were automatically detected using the CMU-Sphinx toolkit for speech recognition (acoustic-phonetic decoding, isolated word recognition and keyword spotting). Two kinds of prosodic features were computed from the speech transcriptions (phoneme, silent pause, filled pause, and breathing): the usual speech rate measures and the audio feature based on the multiresolution paradigm. The answer type features were introduced. A set of answer types was chosen from the transcription of the Training set and each answer type was modeled by a bag-of-words. Experiments have shown improvements of 13.0% and 3.8% on the Development and Test sets respectively, compared to the official baseline Unweighted Average Recall.
منابع مشابه
Production of English Lexical Stress by Persian EFL Learners
This study examines the phonetic properties of lexical stress in English produced by Persian speakers learning English as a foreign language. The four most reliable phonetic correlates of English lexical stress, namely fundamental frequency, duration, intensity, and vowel quality were measured across Persian speakers’ production of the stressed and unstressed syllables of five English disyllabi...
متن کاملLiterature review for Deception detection
Deception is a very common phenomenon, especially human communication, and people have been interested in how to accurately detect deception for much of human history. In recent years, detecting deception has became a huge point of interest for many different fields of research, such as business, jurisprudence, law enforcement, and national security. Deception and its detection is a complicated...
متن کاملCombining Acoustic-Prosodic, Lexical, and Phonotactic Features for Automatic Deception Detection
Improving methods of automatic deception detection is an important goal of many researchers from a variety of disciplines, including psychology, computational linguistics, and criminology. We present a system to automatically identify deceptive utterances using acoustic-prosodic, lexical, syntactic, and phonotactic features. We train and test our system on the Interspeech 2016 ComParE challenge...
متن کاملIndividual Differences in Deception and Deception Detection
We are building a new corpus of deceptive and nondeceptive speech, using American English and Mandarin Chinese adult native speakers, to investigate individual and cultural differences in acoustic, prosodic, and lexical cues to deception. Here, we report on the role of personality factors using the NEO-FFI (Neuroticism-Extraversion-Openness Five Factor Inventory), gender, ethnicity and confiden...
متن کاملProsodic features of four types of disfluencies
We present a corpus-based approach for using intonation and duration to detect disfluency sites. The questions we aim to answer are: What are the prosodic cues for each disfluency type? Can predictive models be built to describe the relationship between disfluency types and prosodic cues? Are there correlations between the reparandum onset and offset and the repair onset and offset? Is there a ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016